AI Court Orders Ledger / N.D. Tex., Dallas Division
“litigators – attorneys and pro se parties (that is, unrepresented or selfrepresented parties) alike”
A brief prepared using generative AI must disclose that fact on its first page under the heading "Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence"; name the specific parts if the presiding judge directs. The standing order imposes nothing beyond the rule and cautions that relying on AI without verifying implicates Rule 11.
Where it goes: First page of the brief, under the rule's own heading
Silence is not neutral: under 7.2(f)(3), filing a brief without the disclosure certifies that no part of it was prepared using generative AI.
Document coordinates: Rule text at p. 16 of the official CIVRULES.pdf (link 1); order at Dkt. 13, Paris v. Carmax Enterprise Services LLC, No. 3:26-cv-2380 (N.D. Tex.) (link 2).
The Self-Represented Edition ($19) puts every ledger court in plain English with the certification wording and a free citation-check protocol. The Office Edition ($49) adds ready-to-file certificates for every court listed.
Self-Represented Edition, $19 Office Edition, $49This page is legal information, not legal advice, and the people who maintain it are not your lawyers. Standing orders change without notice: the linked primary document is the authority the day you file. Every quotation here was checked against the issuing court's own document on the last-verified date shown.
Maintained by National Standard Consulting. Ledger built 2026-10-20. Page generator: build_ledger.py.